“That all persons shall, before conviction, be bailable by
sufficient sureties, except for capital offenses, when the proof is
evident or the presumption great; and that excessive bail shall not in
any case be required.”
See also Ala.Code 1975, § 15-13-2, and -3, for right to bail as a matter of
right.
Assuming that the offense is bailable, Rule 7.2 is based on the presumption
of innocence of the accused and the policy that a defendant should be released
pending trial whenever possible. The defendant is eligible for a recognizance
release unless the judge determines that the defendant’s presence would not
thereby be reasonably assured or that the defendant poses a real and present
danger of harm to others. The list of factors to be considered is taken from the
ABA, Standards for Criminal Justice, Pretrial Release 10-5.1 (2d ed. 1986).
Section (b) recognizes that after conviction the defendant is no longer
presumed innocent and is not entitled admission to bail as a matter of right. If the
defendant’s sentence is for twenty (20) years or less, he can be admitted to bail,
in the judge’s discretion, unless the judge has reason to believe that bail will not
reasonably assure that the defendant will not flee, or that there is a real and present
danger to others posed by the defendant’s being at large, thereby modifying
Ala.Code 1975, § 12-22-170, which unconditionally allows bail if the sentence does
not exceed twenty (20) years.
Under Rule 7.2(b)(2)(i), a convicted defendant may apply for release on an
appearance bond or on his personal recognizance at the time of filing a notice of
appeal. This changes former practice whereby application for release had to be
made with the filing of notice of appeal at the time sentence was rendered (i.e., at
the time sentence was pronounced), an unduly restrictive, unfair, and technical
trap for the unwary practitioner. See Ex parte Downer, 44 Ala.App. 77, 203 So.2d
132 (1967); Ex parte Rogers, 53 Ala.App. 245, 298 So.2d 665 (1974); Ex parte
Pennington, 57 Ala.App. 128, 326 So.2d 656 (1976). For “Appeal as of Right—
When Taken,” see A.R.App.P., Rule 4(b). Cf. Fed.R.Crim.P., Rule 46(c).
Rule 7.2(b)(2) allows some discretion to the trial judge in releasing the
defendant on bail or on the defendant’s personal recognizance. If the defendant
has initially filed a notice of appeal at the time sentence was pronounced but
elected to waive release and to begin serving the sentence, and thereafter
requests that the sentence be suspended, whether to grant bail is left to the
discretion of the trial court. There are no cases on this point, and there has been
some question whether the trial court retains jurisdiction over the defendant,
because the defendant will have already begun serving sentence. However, it is
preferable that the trial court make the release decision, because that court is more
familiar with the case, because the record is usually still with the trial court, and
because any witnesses would be more readily available to that court.