10
- Biodiversity: regarding impacts to biodiversity, there is not enough evidence for
contamination, especially in Cyprus, since no GMOs are cultivated in its territory. However,
there is a possibility for adverse impacts to the biodiversity, depending on the circumstances
and the specific conditions of a territory. More serious impacts will be observed in protected
areas, especially areas included the “Natura 2000” Network, where currently, GMO
cultivation is not allowed. In these areas, additional buffer areas need to be established from
any GMO cultivation. When a GMO is to be cultivated, any relative species that is endemic
to the natural environment in the area needs to be examined, since the contamination risk is
high.
- Flora: If GM plants pass their new traits on to their wild relatives, those relatives could be
changed in a way that could make them play a different ecological role, potentially enabling
them to out-compete other species.
- Fauna: there is potential decrease in the fauna biodiversity from the proximity of the GMO
cultivation due to highly insect resistance plants which limits the insect population, thus
limiting other organisms whose diet depends on insects (eg chukars, quails). This alternately
changes farther the food chain of the area. It is also important to take into consideration the
issue of bees and the risk of contamination of local flora and endemic species. Also, there is a
high risk of horizontal contamination.
- Landscapes.
Any other impacts you would like to mention:
In addition, the activities of the public are affected by GMO cultivation such as small-scale
agriculture, natural habitats protection and management and food production.
2.3. Renewable or non-renewable resources
Does the placing on the market of GMOs have an impact, if so which ones, regarding the use
of renewable resources (water, soil…)? The use of soil will probably be affected since there
is no community legislation that covers GMO residues from cultivation after the
authorization of a product. This needs to be further handled since the GMO residues may
have an impact to the productivity of the soil and the quality of conventional farming.
Regarding biofuels, the price of biofuels resulting from GMOs is lower than the price of
biofuels from non-GMO plants, thus, placing in the market biofuels from GMOs lowers the
final price of the fuel for the consumer. This will make it more profitable for suppliers of
automotive fuels in Cyprus to include a certain percentage of biofuels in transport fuels, thus
use any EU approved GMO produced biofuel. It should be noted that this applies only to the
import of biofuels as a final product. We consider that the cultivation of GM plants in order
to produce biofuels will have a number of negative impacts to renewable and non-renewable
sources of Cyprus (land, water, biodiversity, soil), and should not be considered as an
alternative.
Regarding water use in relation to GMO cultivation, the different climatic conditions need to
be taken into consideration since experiments completed for GMO crops in some
environments may show less usage of water and may not have the same results in other
environments and climatic conditions, such as Cyprus.