Order: JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

In the Matter of:

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,

J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and

J.P. Morgan Securities plc,

Respondents.

)

CFTC Docket No. 22-07

ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 6(c) AND (d) OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT, MAKING

FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS

I. INTRODUCTION

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) has reason to believe that

from at least July 2015 to the present (“Relevant Period”), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P.

Morgan Securities LLC, and J.P. Morgan Securities plc (collectively, “JPMorgan” or

“Respondents”) violated, as set forth below, Sections 4g, 4s(f)(1)(C), 4s(g)(1) and (3), and

4s(h)(1)(B) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 6g, 6s(f)(1)(C), 6s(g)(1), (3),

6s(h)(1)(B), and Commission Regulations (“Regulations”) 1.31, 1.35, 23.201, 23.202(a)(1),

(b)(1), 23.602, and 166.3, 17 C.F.R. §§ 1.31, 1.35, 23.201, 23.202(a)(1), (b)(1), 23.602 (2020),

17 C.F.R. § 166.3 (2021). Therefore, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public

interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted to determine

whether Respondents engaged in the violations set forth herein and to determine whether any

order should be issued imposing remedial sanctions.

In anticipation of the institution of an administrative proceeding, Respondents have

submitted an Offer of Settlement (“Offer”), which the Commission has determined to accept.

Respondents admit the facts set forth in Section II below, acknowledge that their conduct

violated the Act and Regulations and consent to the entry of this Order Instituting Proceedings

Pursuant to Section 6(c) and (d) of the Commodity Exchange Act, Making Findings, and

Imposing Remedial Sanctions (“Order”), and acknowledge service of this Order.

Respondents consent to the use of the findings of fact and conclusions of law in this Order in this proceeding and

in any other proceeding brought by the Commission or to which the Commission is a party or claimant, and agree

that they shall be taken as true and correct and be given preclusive effect therein, without further proof.

RECEIVED CFTC

Office of Proceedings

Proceedings Clerk

7:16 am, Dec 17, 2021

II. FINDINGS

The Commission finds the following:

A. SUMMARY

The Act and Regulations impose recordkeeping and supervision requirements on

Commission registrants to ensure that they responsibly discharge their crucial role in our

markets. Compliance with these requirements is essential to the Commission’s efforts to

promote the integrity, resilience, and vibrancy of the U.S. derivatives markets through sound

regulation.

During the course of a Commission investigation into certain of JPMorgan’s trading,

Commission staff issued subpoenas to JPMorgan for certain communications. The Division

learned, based on communications received from a third party, that JPMorgan traders had been

using personal text messages and WhatsApp to communicate. Moreover, certain of those

communications were responsive to the Commission’s subpoenas. JPMorgan did not collect, or

maintain, its employees’ messages over unapproved channels on personal devices.

Consequently, JPMorgan did not produce those responsive communications to the Commission.

In or about April 2021, Commission staff brought the use of unapproved communication

methods by certain of JPMorgan’s traders to JPMorgan’s attention. Thereafter, JPMorgan

notified Commission staff that the firm was aware of widespread and longstanding use by

JPMorgan employees of unapproved methods to engage in business-related communications.

The Commission’s subsequent investigation with respect to JPMorgan employee use of

unapproved methods of communication revealed that, during the Relevant Period, JPMorgan

employees, including those at senior levels, communicated both internally and externally on

unapproved channels, including via personal text messages and WhatsApp messages. These

written communications were sent and received by JPMorgan employees and included messages

related to JPMorgan’s businesses as Commission registrants that were required to be maintained

under Commission-mandated recordkeeping requirements. None of these written

communications were maintained and preserved by JPMorgan, and they were not able to be

furnished promptly to a Commission representative when requested. As a result, JPMorgan

violated, as set forth below, Sections 4g, 4s(f)(1)(C) and 4s(g)(1) and (3) of the Act and

Regulations 1.31, 1.35, 23.201, and 23.202(a)(1) and (b)(1).

In addition, the widespread use of unauthorized communication methods by JPMorgan’s

employees to conduct firm business violated JPMorgan’s own policies and procedures, which

prohibited such communications. JPMorgan did not maintain adequate internal controls with

respect to business-related communications on non-approved communication methods. Indeed,

Respondents do not consent, however, to the use of this Order, or the findings or conclusions herein, as the sole

basis for any other proceeding brought by the Commission or to which the Commission is a party or claimant, other

than: a proceeding in bankruptcy or receivership; or a proceeding to enforce the terms of this Order. Respondents

do not consent to the use of the Offer or this Order, or the findings or conclusions in this Order, by any other party in

any other proceeding.

some of the very same supervisory personnel at JPMorgan responsible for ensuring compliance

with JPMorgan’s policies and procedures themselves utilized non-approved methods of

communication to engage in business-related communications, in violation of firm policy.

Because JPMorgan failed to implement a diligent supervisory system to ensure compliance with

Commission recordkeeping requirements and the firm’s own policies and procedures, and

because the widespread use of unauthorized communication methods resulted in the firm’s

failure to maintain Commission-required records, JPMorgan failed to diligently supervise

matters related to its business as a Commission registrant in violation of Section 4s(h)(1)(B) of

the Act and Regulations 166.3 and 23.602, as set forth below.

B. RESPONDENTS

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is a national banking association with its main office in

New York City. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is provisionally registered with the Commission

as a swap dealer and provides consumer finance, investment banking, commercial banking, and

other services.

J.P. Morgan Securities LLC is a limited liability company with its principal place of

business in New York City. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC is registered with the Commission as a

Futures Commission Merchant (“FCM”) and is provisionally registered with the Commission as

a swap dealer.

J.P. Morgan Securities plc is a company with its principal place of business in London,

England. J.P. Morgan Securities plc is provisionally registered with the Commission as a swap

dealer.

C. FACTS

During the course of a Commission investigation into certain of JPMorgan’s trading,

Commission staff issued subpoenas to JPMorgan for specified communications. Separately,

Commission staff obtained communications from a third party that reflected numerous text and

WhatsApp messages to or from JPMorgan employees that occurred over unapproved channels on

those employees’ personal devices. Although certain of the communications between the

JPMorgan employees and the third party were responsive to the Commission’s subpoenas,

JPMorgan did not collect those messages or produce them to the Commission because the

messages were sent or received through non-JPMorgan-approved communication methods on

those employees’ personal devices. Commission staff only learned of the communications from

a third party. Commission staff were additionally aware, based on the information obtained from

the third party, that some JPMorgan employees no longer possessed communications that had

been sent or received by non-approved methods.

Upon learning of these communications, Commission staff notified JPMorgan that the

Commission was aware that certain of JPMorgan’s traders had communicated via unapproved

communication methods, including personal text and WhatsApp messages, that were apparently

not surveilled and maintained by JPMorgan. In response to Commission staff’s questions

regarding JPMorgan employees’ use of unapproved channels on those employees’ personal

devices, JPMorgan notified Commission staff that the firm was aware of the widespread and

longstanding use by JPMorgan employees—including senior-level employees—of unapproved

methods to engage in business-related communications.

Importantly, during the Relevant Period, JPMorgan policies and procedures broadly

prohibited employees from using non-approved methods, such as personal text messages and

WhatsApp, to engage in business-related communications. And certain JPMorgan policies

explicitly stated that the policies are to be applied consistently with applicable Commission rules

or regulations, specifically referencing 1.31 and 23.202(a)(1).

Messages sent through JPMorgan-approved communications methods were monitored,

subject to review, and when appropriate, archived. By contrast, messages sent using unapproved

communication methods, including over WhatsApp, email, and text messages on personal

devices, were not monitored, subject to review, or archived.

As a result of JPMorgan’s failure to ensure that employees—including supervisors and

senior-level employees—complied with the firm’s communications policies and procedures,

JPMorgan failed to maintain thousands of business-related communications in connection with

its commodities and swaps businesses, and thus failed diligently to supervise its businesses as

Commission registrants. These supervision failures resulted in the widespread use of non-

approved methods of communication by many JPMorgan employees in violation of the firm’s

policies and procedures, as well as a widespread failure to maintain certain records required to be

maintained pursuant to Commission recordkeeping requirements.

An analysis, for example, of the three traders whose communications that were the

subject of Commission subpoenas in the investigation noted above illustrates the breadth of

JPMorgan’s supervision and recordkeeping failures. An analysis of just those three custodians

reveals the frequent use of non-approved methods to communicate with brokers and market

participants. Further, those three traders’ communications revealed that dozens more JPMorgan

employees (including numerous supervisors, managing directors, and executive directors)

conducted firm business on unapproved channels (including in hundreds of text and WhatsApp

messages). Certain of these communications constituted records that were required to be kept

pursuant to Commission recordkeeping requirements, and none of the communications were

preserved and maintained by JPMorgan.

JPMorgan’s recordkeeping and supervision failures were firm-wide and involved

employees at all levels of authority. Moreover, employees’ use of unapproved communication

methods was not hidden within the firm. To the contrary, certain supervisors—the very people

responsible for supervising employees to prevent this misconduct—routinely communicated

using unapproved channels on their personal devices. In fact, managing directors and senior

supervisors responsible for implementing JPMorgan’s policies and procedures, and for

overseeing employees’ compliance with those policies and procedures, themselves failed to

comply with firm policies by communicating using non-firm approved methods on their personal

devices about the firm’s Commission-regulated businesses.

III. LEGAL DISCUSSION

A. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and J.P. Morgan

Securities plc’s Failure to Maintain Required Records in Violation of Section

4s(f)(1)(C) and 4s(g)(1) and (3) of the Act and Regulations 23.201(a)(1),

23.202(a)(1), and 23.202(b)(1)

Section 4s(f)(1)(C) of the Act obligates swap dealers to keep “books and records of all

activities related to its business as a swap dealer . . . in such form and manner and for such period

as may be prescribed by the Commission by rule or regulation” and those books and records

must be kept “open to inspection and examination by any representative of the Commission.” 7

U.S.C. § 6s(f)(1)(C); see also Section 4s(g)(1) and (3) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6s(g)(1), (3)

(requiring swap dealers to keep daily trading and counterparty records). These statutes are

implemented, among other places, at Regulations 23.201(a)(1), 23.202(a)(1), and 23.202(b)(1),

17 C.F.R. § 23.201(a)(1), 23.202(a)(1), 23.202(b)(1) (2020).

Regulation 23.201(a) obligates a swap dealer to “keep full, complete, and systematic

records, together with all pertinent data and memoranda, of all its swaps activities,” including

“[r]ecords of each transaction, including all documents on which transaction information is

originally recorded.” Regulation 23.202(a)(1) and (b)(1), 17 C.F.R. § 23.202(a)(1), (b)(1)

(2020), requires, in relevant part, every swap dealer to keep daily trading records of all swaps

and related cash and forward transactions it executes including, specifically, a record of oral and

written communications provided or received concerning quotes, solicitations, bids, offers,

instructions, trading, and prices that led to the execution of a swap transaction or the conclusion

of a related cash or forward transaction.

During the Relevant Period, as a result of the widespread employee use of unapproved

communication methods, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and J.P.

Morgan Securities plc failed to maintain Commission-required transaction records and pre-

execution communications. By this conduct, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan

Securities LLC, and J.P. Morgan Securities plc violated Sections 4s(f)(1)(C) and 4s(g)(1) and (3)

of the Act and Regulations 23.201(a)(1), 23.202(a)(1), and 23.202(b)(1).

B. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC’s Failure to Keep Required Records in Violation

of Section 4g of the Act and Regulation 1.35

Section 4g of the Act requires FCMs and other registrants to create and keep books and

records pertaining to transactions and positions in such form and manner and for such period as

may be required by the Commission. 7 U.S.C. § 6g. Regulation 1.35(a)(1), 17 C.F.R. §

1.35(a)(1) (2020), sets forth some of the books and records that are required to be created and

maintained by FCMs. Specifically, an FCM must:

(i) Keep full, complete, and systematic records . . . of all transactions relating to

its business of dealing in commodity interests . . . which shall include all orders

(filled, unfilled, or canceled), . . . and all other records, which have been prepared

in the course of its business of dealing in commodity interests . . . .

***

(iii) Keep all oral and written communications provided or received concerning

quotes, solicitations, bids, offers, instructions, trading, and prices that lead to the

execution of a transaction in a commodity interest . . . whether transmitted by

telephone, voicemail, facsimile, instant messaging, chat rooms, electronic mail,

mobile device, or other digital or electronic media . . . .

With the exception of pre-trade communications, all such records are required to be “kept in a

form and manner that allows for the identification of a particular transaction.” Regulation

1.35(a)(5), 17 C.F.R. § 1.35(a)(5) (2020).

As a result of the widespread use of unapproved methods of communication by firm

employees, which communications were not preserved and maintained, J.P. Morgan Securities

LLC failed to keep full, complete, and systematic records of all transactions relating to its

business of dealing in commodity interests, in violation of Section 4g of the Act and Regulation

1.35.

C. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and J.P. Morgan

Securities plc’s Failure to Keep Records in Required Manner in Violation of

Regulation 1.31

Regulation 1.31(b)(4), 17 C.F.R. § 1.31(b)(4) (2020), requires that registrants keep all

books and records that are required to be maintained under the Act and Regulations in such

manner as to make them “readily accessible” for a period of two years for paper records and for

the duration of the retention period for electronic records. Upon request of the Commission, all

of these documents are required to be “promptly” produced. Regulation 1.31(d), 17 C.F.R.

§ 1.31(d) (2020). Regulation 23.203(b)(1), 17 C.F.R. § 23.203(b)(1) (2020), requires that

records required to be kept pursuant to Part 23 of the Regulations, be kept in accordance with

Regulation 1.31, 17 C.F.R. § 1.31 (2020).

By failing to keep all Commission-required records in such a manner as to make them

“readily accessible,” JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and J.P. Morgan

Securities plc violated Regulation 1.31. In addition, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. violated

Regulation 1.31 by not promptly producing such communications upon request in connection

with the Commission’s investigation, as described above.

D. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and J.P. Morgan

Securities plc’s Failure to Supervise Diligently in Violation of Section

4s(h)(1)(B) of the Act and Regulation 23.602(a)

Section 4s(h)(1)(B) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6s(h)(1)(B), requires “diligent supervision of

the business of the registered swap dealer[.]” Regulation 23.602 requires that each swap dealer

“shall establish and maintain a system to supervise, and shall diligently supervise, all activities

relating to its business performed by its partners, members, officers, employees, and agents (or

persons occupying a similar status or performing a similar function).” 17 C.F.R. § 23.602(a)

(2020). The operative language of Regulation 23.602 is similar to the language of the

Commission’s longstanding supervision regulation for futures and options, Regulation 166.3,

17 C.F.R. § 166.3 (2021).

Under Regulation 23.602, a violation is demonstrated by showing either that: (1) the

registrant’s supervisory system was generally inadequate; or (2) the registrant failed to perform

its supervisory duties diligently. See In re Commerzbank AG, CFTC No. 19-03, 2018 WL

5921385, at *10-11 (Nov. 8, 2018) (consent order) (noting textual similarities between

Regulation 23.602 and Regulation 166.3, applying case law concerning Regulation 166.3, and

citing In re Murlas Commodities, Inc., CFTC No. 85-29, 1995 WL 523563, at *9 (Sept. 1, 1995),

and In re Paragon Futures Assoc., CFTC No. 88-18, 1992 WL 74261, at *14 (Apr. 1, 1992)); In

re INTL FCStone Markets, LLC, CFTC No. 15-27, 2015 WL 4980321, at *3 (Aug. 19, 2015)

(consent order) (same). Evidence of violations that “‘should be detected by a diligent system of

supervision, either because of the nature of the violations or because the violations have occurred

repeatedly,’ is probative of a failure to supervise.” In re Société Générale Int'l Ltd., CFTC No.

19-38, 2009 WL 4915485, at *7 (Sept. 30, 2019) (consent order) (quoting In re INTL FCStone

Markets, 2015 WL 4980321, at *3).

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and J.P. Morgan Securities

plc failed to supervise their swap dealer business activities diligently during the Relevant Period.

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and J.P. Morgan Securities plc failed

to maintain an adequate supervisory system to ensure that employees did not utilize non-

approved methods to engage in communications relating to firm business, including the swap

dealer business. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and J.P. Morgan

Securities plc’s failure to supervise is demonstrated by their failure to detect, prevent, and

remediate repeated violations of the Commission’s recordkeeping requirements and firm policies

and procedures. Supervisory personnel failed to ensure that employees complied with the

Commission’s recordkeeping requirements and firm communications policies and in some

instances themselves violated the policies. These supervision failures also resulted in the failure

to keep and maintain Commission-required records, the failure to maintain the records in such a

manner as to make them readily available, and the failure to produce the records promptly upon

request. By this conduct, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and J.P.

Morgan Securities plc failed to supervise diligently their officers, employees, and agents, in

violation of Section 4s(h)(1)(B) of the Act and Regulation 23.602(a).

E. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC’s Failure to Diligently Supervise in Violation of

Regulation 166.3

Regulation 166.3 states:

Each Commission registrant, except an associated person who has no supervisory

duties, must diligently supervise the handling by its partners, officers, employees

and agents (or persons occupying a similar status or performing a similar

function) of all commodity interest accounts carried, operated, advised or

introduced by the registrant and all other activities of its partners, officers,

employees and agents (or persons occupying a similar status or performing a

similar function) relating to its business as a Commission registrant.

17 C.F.R. § 166.3 (2021).

A violation under Regulation 166.3 is an independent violation for which no underlying

violation is necessary. See In re Collins, CFTC No. 94-13, 1997 WL 761927, at *10 (Dec. 10,

1997). A violation of Regulation 166.3 is demonstrated by showing either that: (1) the

registrant’s supervisory system was generally inadequate; or (2) the registrant failed to perform

its supervisory duties diligently. In re Murlas Commodities, Inc., CFTC No. 85-29, 1995 WL

523563, at *9 (Sept. 1, 1995); Sansom Refining Co. v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc., CFTC No.

82-R448, 1990 WL 282783, at *11 (Feb. 16, 1990) (noting that, under Regulation 166.3,

registrants have “duty to develop procedures for the detection and deterrence of possible

wrongdoing by [their] agents” (internal quotation omitted)); In re GNP Commodities, Inc., CFTC

No. 89-1, 1992 WL 201158, at *17-19 (Aug. 11, 1992) (providing that, even if an adequate

supervisory system is in place, Regulation 166.3 can still be violated if the supervisory system is

not diligently administered); see also In re Rosenthall Collins Grp., LLC, CFTC No. 12-18, 2012

WL 1242406, at *6 (Apr. 12, 2012) (consent order) (respondent failed to perform supervisory

duties diligently by not following its compliance procedures that were in place). Evidence of

violations that “should be detected by a diligent system of supervision, either because of the

nature of the violations or because the violations have occurred repeatedly” is probative of a

failure to diligently supervise. In re Paragon Futures Assoc., CFTC No. 88-18, 1992 WL 74261,

at *14 (Apr. 1, 1992) (“The focus of any proceeding to determine whether Rule 166.3 has been

violated will be on whether [a] review [has] occurred and, if it did, whether it was ‘diligent.’”).

J.P. Morgan Securities LLC failed to supervise its business as a Commission registrant by

failing to maintain adequate supervisory systems to ensure that employees complied with

Commission recordkeeping requirements and firm policies and procedures that prohibited

business-related communications on non-approved methods of communication. The inadequacy

of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC’s supervisory systems is demonstrated by the longstanding and

repeated violations of the Commission’s recordkeeping regulations and firm policies and

procedures, including by supervisory personnel, and the fact that the supervisory failures resulted

in the repeated failure to maintain Commission-required records, to ensure that the required

records were readily accessible, and that the records could be promptly produced upon request.

By this conduct, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC failed to supervise diligently its officers,

employees, and agents in violation of Regulation 166.3.

IV. FINDINGS OF VIOLATIONS

Based on the foregoing, the Commission finds that, during the Relevant Period,

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and J.P. Morgan Securities plc

violated Sections 4s(f)(1)(C), 4s(g)(1) and (3), and 4s(h)(1)(B) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. §§

6s(f)(1)(C), 6s(g)(1), (3), 6s(h)(1)(B), and Regulations 1.31, 23.201, 23.202(a)(1) and (b)(1), and

23.602, 17 C.F.R. §§ 1.31, 23.201, 23.202(a)(1), (b)(1), and 23.602 (2020); and J.P. Morgan

Securities LLC violated Section 4g of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6g, and Regulations 1.35 and 166.3, 17

C.F.R. § 1.35 (2020), 17 C.F.R. § 166.3 (2021).

V. OFFER OF SETTLEMENT

Respondents have submitted the Offer in which they:

A. Acknowledge service of this Order;

B. Admit the facts described in Section II above and acknowledge that their conduct

violated the Act and Regulations;

C. Admit the jurisdiction of the Commission with respect to all matters set forth in this

Order and for any action or proceeding brought or authorized by the Commission based

on violation of or enforcement of this Order;

D. Waive:

1. The filing and service of a complaint and notice of hearing;

2. A hearing;

3. All post-hearing procedures;

4. Judicial review by any court;

5. Any and all objections to the participation by any member of the Commission’s

staff in the Commission’s consideration of the Offer;

6. Any and all claims that they may possess under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5

U.S.C. § 504, and 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and/or the rules promulgated by the

Commission in conformity therewith, Part 148 of the Regulations, 17 C.F.R.

pt. 148 (2021), relating to, or arising from, this proceeding;

7. Any and all claims that they may possess under the Small Business Regulatory

Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, tit. II, §§ 201–253, 110

Stat. 847, 857–74 (codified as amended at 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and in scattered

sections of 5 U.S.C. and 15 U.S.C.), relating to, or arising from, this proceeding;

and

8. Any claims of Double Jeopardy based on the institution of this proceeding or the

entry in this proceeding of any order imposing a civil monetary penalty or any

other relief, including this Order;

E. Stipulate that the record basis on which this Order is entered shall consist solely of the

findings contained in this Order to which Respondents have consented in the Offer; and

F. Consent, solely on the basis of the Offer, to the Commission’s entry of this Order that:

1. Makes findings by the Commission that JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan

Securities LLC, and J.P. Morgan Securities plc violated Sections 4s(f)(1)(C),

4s(g)(1) and (3), and 4s(h)(1)(B) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 6s(f)(1)(C), 6s(g)(1), (3),

6s(h)(1)(B), and Regulations 1.31, 23.201, 23.202(a)(1) and (b)(1), and 23.602, 17

C.F.R. §§ 1.31, 23.201, 23.202(a)(1), (b)(1), and 23.602 (2020); and J.P. Morgan

Securities LLC violated Section 4g of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6g, and Regulations 1.35

and 166.3, 17 C.F.R. § 1.35 (2020), 17 C.F.R. § 166.3 (2021).

2. Orders JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and J.P. Morgan

Securities plc to cease and desist from violating Sections 4s(f)(1)(C), 4s(g)(1) and

(3), and 4s(h)(1)(B) of the Act, and Regulations 1.31, 23.201, 23.202(a)(1) and

(b)(1), and 23.602; and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC to cease and desist from

violating Section 4g of the Act and Regulations 1.35 and 166.3.

3. Orders Respondents to pay, jointly and severally, a civil monetary penalty in the

amount of seventy-five million US dollars ($75,000,000), plus post-judgment

interest within fourteen days of the date of entry of this Order;

4. Orders Respondents and their successors and assigns to comply with the conditions

and undertakings consented to in the Offer and as set forth in Part VI of this Order;

and

5. Represents that it has engaged in a review of certain recordkeeping failures and

begun a program of remediation.

6. Upon consideration, the Commission has determined to accept the Offer.

VI. ORDER

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

A. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and J.P. Morgan Securities

plc and their successors and assigns shall cease and desist from violating Sections

4s(f)(1)(C), 4s(g)(1) and (3), and 4s(h)(1)(B) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 6s(f)(1)(C),

6s(g)(1), (3), 6s(h)(1)(B), and Regulations 1.31, 23.201, 23.202(a)(1) and (b)(1), and

23.602, 17 C.F.R. §§ 1.31, 23.201, 23.202(a)(1), (b)(1), and 23.602 (2020); and J.P.

Morgan Securities LLC and its successors and assigns shall cease and desist from

violating Section 4g of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6g, and Regulations 1.35 and 166.3, 17 C.F.R.

§ 1.35 (2020), 17 C.F.R. § 166.3 (2021).

B. Respondents shall pay, jointly and severally, a civil monetary penalty in the amount of

seventy-five million US dollars ($75,000,000) (“CMP Obligation”), within fourteen days

of the date of the entry of this Order. If the CMP Obligation is not paid in full within

fourteen days of the date of entry of this Order, then post-judgment interest shall accrue

on the CMP Obligation beginning on the date of entry of this Order and shall be

determined by using the Treasury Bill rate prevailing on the date of entry of this Order

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961.

Respondents shall pay the CMP Obligation and any post-judgment interest by electronic

funds transfer, U.S. postal money order, certified check, bank cashier’s check, or bank

money order. If payment is to be made other than by electronic funds transfer, then the

payment shall be made payable to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and sent

to the address below:

MMAC/ESC/AMK326

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Division of Enforcement

6500 S. MacArthur Blvd.

HQ Room 181

Oklahoma City, OK 73169

(405) 954-6569 office

(405) 954-1620 fax

9-AMC-AR-CFTC@faa.gov

If payment is to be made by electronic funds transfer, Respondents shall contact Jamie

Stovall or her successor at the above address to receive payment instructions and shall

fully comply with those instructions. Respondents shall accompany payment of the CMP

Obligation with a cover letter that identifies the paying Respondent and the name and

docket number of this proceeding. The paying Respondent shall simultaneously transmit

copies of the cover letter and the form of payment to the Chief Financial Officer,

Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW,

Washington, D.C. 20581;

C. Respondents and their successors and assigns shall comply with the following conditions

and undertakings set forth in the Offer:

1. JPMorgan.

a. JPMorgan shall conduct:

i. A comprehensive review of JPMorgan’s supervisory, compliance, and

other policies and procedures designed to ensure that JPMorgan’s

electronic communications, including those found on personal

electronic devices, including without limitation, cellular phones

(“Personal Devices”), are preserved in accordance with the

requirements of the Act, the Regulations, and JPMorgan’s policies and

procedures.

ii. A comprehensive review of training conducted by JPMorgan to ensure

personnel are complying with the requirements regarding the

preservation of electronic communications, including those found on

Personal Devices, in accordance with the requirements of the Act and

the Regulations, and JPMorgan’s policies and procedures, including by

ensuring that JPMorgan personnel certify in writing on a quarterly

basis that they are complying with preservation requirements.

iii. An assessment of the surveillance program measures implemented by

JPMorgan to ensure compliance, on an ongoing basis, with the

requirements found in the Act, the Regulations, and JPMorgan’s

policies and procedures to preserve electronic communications,

including those found on Personal Devices.

iv. An assessment of the technological solutions that JPMorgan has begun

implementing to meet the record retention requirements of the Act, the

Regulations, and JPMorgan’s policies and procedures, including an

assessment of the likelihood that JPMorgan personnel will use the

technological solutions going forward and a review of the measures

employed by JPMorgan to track employee usage of new technological

solutions.

v. An assessment of the measures used by JPMorgan to prevent the use

of unauthorized communications methods for business

communications by employees. This assessment should include, but

not be limited to, a review of the firm’s policies and procedures to

ascertain if they provide for any significant technology and/or

behavioral restrictions that help prevent the risk of the use of

unapproved communications methods on Personal Devices (e.g.,

trading floor restrictions).

vi. A review of JPMorgan’s electronic communications surveillance

routines to ensure that electronic communications through approved

communications methods found on Personal Devices are incorporated

into JPMorgan’s overall communications surveillance program.

vii. A comprehensive review of the framework adopted by JPMorgan to

address instances of non-compliance by JPMorgan employees with

JPMorgan’s policies and procedures concerning the use of Personal

Devices to communicate about JPMorgan business in the past. This

review shall include a survey of how JPMorgan determined which

employees failed to comply with JPMorgan policies and procedures,

the corrective action carried out, an evaluation of who violated policies

and why, what penalties were imposed, and whether penalties were

handed out consistently across business lines and seniority levels.

b. Within forty-five (45) days after completion of the review set forth in sub-

paragraphs a.i. through a.vii. above, JPMorgan shall submit a detailed written

report of its findings to the Commission staff (the “Report”). The Report shall

include a description of the review performed, the names of the individuals

who performed the review, the conclusions reached, and a summary of the

plan for implementing the recommended changes in or improvements to

JPMorgan’s policies and procedures.

c. JPMorgan shall adopt all recommendations contained in the Report within one

hundred and thirty-five (135) days of the date of the Report.

d. The Report will likely include confidential financial, proprietary, competitive

business or commercial information. Public disclosure of the reports could

discourage cooperation, impede pending or potential government

investigations or undermine the objectives of the reporting requirement. For

these reasons, among others, the reports and the contents thereof are intended

to remain and shall remain non-public, except (1) pursuant to court order; (2)

as agreed to by the parties in writing; (3) to the extent that the Commission

determines in its sole discretion that disclosure would be in furtherance of the

Commission’s discharge of its duties and responsibilities; or (4) is otherwise

required by law.

2. One-Year Evaluation: JPMorgan shall assess its program for the preservation, as

required under the Act, Regulations, and JPMorgan’s policies and procedures, of

electronic communications, including those found on Personal Devices, commencing

one year after submitting the Report required by Paragraph 1.b above. JPMorgan

shall require this review to evaluate JPMorgan’s progress in the areas described in

Paragraph 1.a.i-vii above. After this review, JPMorgan shall submit a report (the

“One Year Report”) to the Commission staff and shall ensure that the One Year

Report includes an updated assessment of JPMorgan’s policies and procedures with

regard to the preservation of electronic communications (including those found on

Personal Devices), training, surveillance programs, and technological solutions

implemented in the prior year period.

3. Reporting Discipline Imposed: For two years following the entry of this Order,

JPMorgan shall notify the Commission staff as follows upon the imposition of any

discipline imposed by JPMorgan, including, but not limited to, written warnings, loss

of any pay, bonus, or incentive compensation, or the termination of employment, with

respect to any employee found to have violated JPMorgan’s policies and procedures

concerning the preservation of electronic communications, including those found on

Personal Devices: (1) at least 48 hours before the filing of a Form 8-T; or (2) within

ten (10) days of the imposition of other discipline.

4. Recordkeeping: JPMorgan shall preserve, for a period of not less than six (6) years

from the end of the fiscal year last used, the first two (2) years in an easily accessible

place, any record of compliance with these undertakings.

5. Public Statements: Respondents agree that neither they nor any of their successors

and assigns, agents or employees under their authority or control shall take any action

or make any public statement denying, directly or indirectly, any findings or

conclusions in this Order or creating, or tending to create, the impression that this

Order is without a factual basis; provided, however, that nothing in this provision

shall affect Respondents’: (1) testimonial obligations; or (2) right to take legal

positions in other proceedings to which the Commission is not a party. Respondents

and their successors and assigns shall comply with this agreement, and shall

undertake all steps necessary to ensure that all of their agents and/or employees under

their authority or control understand and comply with this agreement.

6. Cooperation, in General: Respondents shall cooperate fully and expeditiously with

the Commission, including the Commission’s Division of Enforcement, in this action,

and in any current or future Commission investigation or action related thereto.

Respondents shall also cooperate in any investigation, civil litigation, or

administrative matter related to, or arising from, this action.

7. Partial Satisfaction: Respondents understand and agree that any acceptance by the

Commission of any partial payment of Respondents’ CMP Obligation shall not be

deemed a waiver of their obligation to make further payments pursuant to this Order,

or a waiver of the Commission’s right to seek to compel payment of any remaining

balance.

8. Deadlines: For good cause shown, Division staff may extend any of the procedural

dates relating to the undertakings. Unless otherwise specified, deadlines for

procedural dates shall be counted in calendar days, except that if the last day falls on

a weekend or federal holiday, the next business day shall be considered to be the last

day.

9. Change of Address/Phone: Until such time as Respondents satisfy in full their CMP

Obligation as set forth in this Order, Respondents shall provide written notice to the

Commission by certified mail of any change to their telephone numbers and mailing

addresses within ten calendar days of the change.

The provisions of this Order shall be effective as of this date.

By the Commission.

______________________________

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Dated: December 17, 2021