Private real estate: Opportunity for income and diversification
2
Key differences
Returns
Private real estate returns historically have been competitive
with listed REITs, bolstered by a premium compensating
investors for illiquidity. Returns for both categories tend to
be more stable over market cycles because income from
long-term leases represents a larger proportion of total
returns, compared to other asset classes. As a result, the
income yield for private real estate and listed REITs has
tended to be higher than investment-grade bonds.
Volatility
Private real estate volatility has been significantly lower
than listed REITs and other stock categories, producing a
record of higher risk-adjusted returns.
3
The lower volatility
is due to its illiquidity with infrequent trading and valuations
determined by periodic appraisals. Listed REITs’ higher
volatility largely reflects broad stock market sentiment and
investment flows, although higher leverage is also a factor.
Liquidity
Listed REITs can play an essential role in providing liquidity
to support portfolio rebalancing, compensating for private
real estate’s illiquidity. Private real estate investment funds
used in DC plans generally include allocations to listed
REITs, other liquid investments and cash for liquidity to
support participant redemptions.
Diversification benefits
Diversification benefits, which help to manage risk, are
a primary reason for including real estate in multi-asset
portfolios. As a distinct asset class, private real estate has
a different risk-return profile than stocks and bonds. Factors
include high and stable income, illiquidity and infrequent
trading that reduce volatility. This is clearly reflected in
Exhibit 2, showing low or negative historical correlations
with stocks and bonds, 0.14 and -0.12, respectively. As a
result, private real estate is less likely to suffer losses at
the same time or to the same degree as stocks, helping to
reduce downside risk in a multi-asset portfolio.
4
Although
publicly traded, listed REITs’ correlations also have been
relatively low with stocks and bonds, 0.68 and 0.04,
respectively. Combining private real estate and listed REITs
may provide additional diversification benefits based on
their record of low correlations to each other, 0.27. The low
correlations reflect differences in how quickly market prices
can be updated and the amount of leverage.
Exhibit 2: Correlations between U.S. real estate,
bonds and stocks (2000-2020)
U.S.
Private real
estate
Listed
REITs
Stocks Bonds
Private real estate
Listed REITs 0.25
Stocks 0.14 0.68
Bonds -0.12 0.04 -0.34
Data as of December 2020. Indexes represented: Private real estate (NCREIF
Fund Index–Open End Diversified Core Equity (NFI–ODCE), REITs (FTSE NAREIT
U.S. Real Estate Index), U.S. stocks (S&P 500 Index), U.S. bonds (Bloomberg
Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index). It is not possible to invest in an index.
Performance for indices does not reflect investment fees or transactions costs.
Source: MacroBond.
Inflation hedging
Private real estate and listed REITs provide a natural hedge
against inflation with commercial rents and property values
highly correlated with rising prices. Exhibit 3, for example,
shows that U.S. private real estate’s net operating income
(NOI) has closely tracked increases in the consumer price
index
5
since 2004 and exceeded it since 2013.
Exhibit 3: Real estate net operating income
(NOI) has outpaced inflation since 2013
U.S. Private real estate income and inflation growth
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
— U.S. Real Estate Net Operating Income — U.S. Inflation
Data as of December 2020. U.S. private real estate net operating income
(NOI) is based on the NCREIF Fund Index–Open End Diversified Core Equity
(NFI–ODCE). U.S. inflation data reflect the Consumer Price Index For All Urban
Consumers (CPIU). Sources: NCREIF, Moody’s Analytics.