!
!
Sample!#1:!Research!Group!Project!
!
Self & Peer Evaluation for a Research Paper Project
Students are required to evaluate the personal productivity of each group member, including themselves. Rate yourself and your group members on
each of the following 6 categories. Total the score for yourself and each of the group members. You may also provide additional comments about
group members (or the dynamics of the group) on the back of this paper.
!
*as we discussed, section 2, the literature review is the most important part of the paper.
When our group was collaborating together, this person:
4- Listens to other’s ideas. Gives broad ideas and expands on them or encourages others to do so. Builds on contributions of others.
3- Listens well. Contributes ideas but the ideas do not deepen the discussion rather maintain it at current level.
2- Listens fairly well but interrupts at times. Rarely deepens the discussion.
1- Overbearing. Interrupts. Doesn’t allow discussion of ideas other than own and/or does not listen or contribute.
The way in which this person participated was:
4- Contributes ideas. Actively speaks up. Brainstorms.
3- Contributes some ideas but is mainly passive.
2- Sits passively.
1- Does nothing.
This person was prepared in the following way:
4- Does more than required.
3- Does what committed to do.
2- Does some of what committed to do.
1- Does nothing.
The typical quality of input this person provided was:
4- Provides extensive accurate information to group members.
3- Information is usually accurate and is an adequate amount.
2- Mostly misinforms group or provides little information.
1- Provides group with no useful accurate information.
This person displayed a knowledge of the subject such as:
4- Attends class and demonstrates understanding of relevant topics. Takes good notes.
3- Misses occasional info., but is generally informed about material covered in class and readings.
2- Misses info. often, but knows some class material and readings.
1- Misses class and expects others to inform him/her about material.
They way in which this person communicated was:
4- Reliably communicates progress to group. Reachable and regularly checks messages/email. Talks with others in group.
3- Stays in fairly good touch with the group, but is occasionally difficult to contact.
2- Is unreachable but initiates communication with others occasionally.
1- Is unreachable and does not communicate with group members about the project.
Section 2 of the paper:
What percentage of section 2 of the paper was contributed by this group member? To what extent did they help write this section, help gather research for this section, help discuss how
this section should be written and improved, and contribute to the overall quality of this section of the paper? Rate anywhere from 0% to 100%. If everyone contributed equally, then the
grand total should equate 100%.
Please write any additional comments on the back of this sheet of paper…→
!