painstakingly arrived at. Yes, from this effort, he panned a
golden classic—The Snowy Day. (Ruffins 89)
He said Keats turned “snow into gold.” Ruffins also commented on the
uniqueness of Keats’s contribution: “In the sixties Ezra believed there
should be children’s book characters other than Dick and Jane, their
Granny, and her damn blue birds. And he did something about it” (89).
Finally, Attention to Children
Keats’s integrating his own life into his work, his disposition toward
characters of color, his book design and artistic commitment to lifting up
those who had been left out of the genre all figured into Keats’s
composition of the counterstories featuring Peter and his friends, but his
identification with children and their responses to his work also contributed.
Cherishing the feedback he got from his readers, he often quoted this
favorite letter from a child: “We like you because you have the mind of a
child” (Silvey 9). Susan Hirschman, who served as his editor for many
years, said that Keats agonized over the mistakes he made in his early
picture books. When a child pointed out that a guinea pig’s tail in Millicent
Selsam’s How Animals Sleep (1968), which Keats illustrated, was actually
the tail of a rat (naked rather than hairy, as it should be), he wrote letters of
apology to both the mother and the child (9). In a better-known conflict,
when Nancy Larrick, former president of the International Reading
Association, published her 1965 “The All-White World of Children’s Books,”
in the Saturday Review, she attacked Keats for his portrayal of the mother
in The Snowy Day. Though praising the book for its sympathetic depiction
of Black characters in general, she labeled the mother a stereotype, “a
huge figure in a gaudy yellow plain dress” (qtd. In Silvey 10). Keats faced