27 August 2020
Dear Board Chair,
As a long-term investor in more than 10,000 public companies across the world, State
Street Global Advisors believes that the single most important driver of long-term value is a
strong, independent and effective board exercising high-quality oversight. In turn, we have
long appreciated the positive correlation among diversity at the workforce and board levels,
effective boards and oversight and sustainable long-term financial performance. As such,
whether through our long-standing stewardship focus on gender diversity and board
effectiveness, amplified by our Fearless Girl campaign, or the integration of Sustainability
Accounting Standards Board (SASB – see Figure 1) diversity metrics into our
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) scoring system, R-Factor™
1
, we have called
on companies to disclose more details regarding the diversity of their boards and
workforces.
The ongoing issue of racial equity has caused us to focus more closely on the ways in which
racial and ethnic diversity impacts us as investors. As such, we are writing to inform you that
starting in 2021, State Street Global Advisors will ask companies in our investment portfolio
to articulate their risks, goals and strategy as related to racial and ethnic diversity, and to
make relevant disclosure available to shareholders.
As long-term investors, we are convinced that the lack of racial and ethnic diversity and
inclusion poses risks to companies that senior managements and boards should understand
and manage. The risks that can arise from having a homogeneous board and workforce are
well understood and drove our focus on gender diversity years ago. Research demonstrates
the tendency for groups composed of people from similar backgrounds to refrain from
challenging prevailing views, as well as the positive impacts that diverse groups can have
on improved decision making, risk oversight and innovation.
2
Other studies have shown that
management teams with a critical mass of racial, ethnic and gender diversity are more likely
to generate above-average profitability.
3
Further, companies that promote workforce
diversity and inclusion through transparent hiring, promotion and wage practices have seen
improved productivity,
4
revenues
5
and market share.
6
Likewise, companies with limited
diversity are more likely to underperform their peers
7
and face reputational risks.
8
Unfortunately, while companies in the United States are required by regulators to track
racial diversity data, only 4% of Russell 1000 companies publicly share detailed data on
their employees’ gender and ethnicity.
9
While gender diversity data is generally measurable and comparable among companies
across the globe, our engagements with portfolio companies have revealed that tracking
racial and ethnic diversity is challenging for companies, boards, and investors. Racial and
ethnic diversity may vary significantly across different countries and regions. From a
disclosure standpoint, some countries limit the gathering of information related to racial and
ethnic minorities. In addition, while SASB’s approach to human capital management is
evolving, its current diversity metrics only apply to nine industries.
While we acknowledge these complexities, we also believe it is critical for boards and
investors to have more robust information and data regarding the racial and ethnic
workforce diversity of companies in their portfolios and to understand the steps they are
taking to achieve relevant goals. To this end, we ask that US companies in our portfolio and,
to the greatest extent possible, non-US companies, provide specific communications to
shareholders in five key areas:
1. Strategy: Articulate what role diversity plays in the firm’s broader human capital
management practices and long-term strategy.
2. Goals: Describe what diversity goals exist, how these goals contribute to the firm’s
overall strategy, and how these goals are managed and progressing.