without mystery or disguise: she was coquettish but not
heartless; exacting, but not worthlessly selsh. She had been
indulged from her birth, but was not absolutely spoilt. She
was hasty, but good-humoured; vain (she could not help it,
when every glance in the glass showed her such a ush of
loveliness), but not aected; liberal-handed; innocent of the
pride of wealth; ingenuous; suciently intelligent; gay, live-
ly, and unthinking: she was very charming, in short, even
to a cool observer of her own sex like me; but she was not
profoundly interesting or thoroughly impressive. A very
dierent sort of mind was hers from that, for instance, of
the sisters of St. John. Still, I liked her almost as I liked my
pupil Adele; except that, for a child whom we have watched
over and taught, a closer aection is engendered than we
can give an equally attractive adult acquaintance.
She had taken an amiable caprice to me. She said I was
like Mr. Rivers, only, certainly, she allowed, ‘not one-tenth
so handsome, though I was a nice neat little soul enough,
but he was an angel.’ I was, however, good, clever, composed,
and rm, like him. I was a lusus naturae, she armed, as a
village schoolmistress: she was sure my previous history, if
known, would make a delightful romance.
One evening, while, with her usual child-like activity,
and thoughtless yet not oensive inquisitiveness, she was
rummaging the cupboard and the table-drawer of my little
kitchen, she discovered rst two French books, a volume
of Schiller, a German grammar and dictionary, and then
my drawing-materials and some sketches, including a pen-
cil-head of a pretty little cherub-like girl, one of my scholars,