RESIDENTIAL
HVAC
INSTALLATION
PRACTICES: A
REVIEW
OF
RESEARCH
FINDINGS
f
Summary
of
Findings
and
Recommendations
Based on the systematic review and analysis, DOE identified the following findings:
Continued pursuit and support of HVAC quality installation is needed, but new approaches may be
required. Despite extensive research, HVAC quality installation and maintenance practices have not been
widely adopted throughout the HVAC industry. Research indicates that training and standards alone are
insufficient to influence trade practices [Appx A: 38, 41] and consumers are driven primarily by low cost
and fast service [Appx A: 8, 40, 42], particularly in retrofit scenarios. Technology solutions in the form of
advanced equipment, controls, and automated verification tools hold promise but need support to engage
the market. As such, collaboration with industry to research and field validate HVAC system performance
is needed.
The prevalence and impact of non-condensables in the refrigerant lines is still unknown. Additional
field research is needed to better quantify the frequency with which systems are operating with non-
condensable contaminants in the refrigerant line, the magnitude and range of the level of contamination,
and the degree to which the system performance is compromised as a result.
More research is needed to determine the relative impact of faults on HVAC system performance
beyond energy (e.g., occupant comfort, indoor air quality, and equipment durability). Most studies
have focused primarily on energy impacts of improper system design and installation practices. Taking the
extra steps to make the necessary measurements and adjustments as a system is installed adds cost and time
to the job. To justify this added burden on the contractor and customer, it would be worthwhile to better
quantify the potential non-energy related benefits of a proper and verified installation. For example, which
faults cause more wear and tear on the equipment, and to what extent do properly performing systems
maintain more consistent comfort and health conditions?
Additional work is needed to improve duct system performance. Ducts with enough leakage to require
sealing can occur as frequently as 70-100% of existing systems, but duct leakage characteristics vary
regionally and duct performance is increasingly dependent on housing vintage as codes (and enforcement)
get better. In addition to leakage, some duct systems suffer from other design (e.g., restrictive duct
capacity) or installation issues (e.g., incorrectly installed flex duct) which can also adversely impact system
performance. These repairs are not a natural fit for any existing trade, the work can be difficult and labor-
intensive, and there is no consumer market for these services. Technological advancements in duct
materials, design, installation, and sealing techniques, as well as market breakthroughs, are needed to
mitigate this issue.
Evolving sizing and equipment selection practices are needed to better address retrofit scenarios
and support proper design of systems using advanced equipment and control technologies. Efforts
should focus on more accurately assessing the balance between sensible and latent loads for cooling,
establishing procedures for selection of multi-stage and variable speed equipment, and developing
methods or tools that speed up and simplify the load calculation process. Although studies have found
that energy savings attributed to proper residential HVAC equipment sizing may be less than previously
estimated, the number of studies with field-verified data on the impacts of sizing on energy efficiency
and system performance is limited [Appx A: 12, 19]. Moreover, retrofit scenarios present unique
challenges as obtaining accurate input data for load calculations can be complicated, time consuming,
and subject to interpretation. In addition, better sizing, equipment selection, and system design guidance
are needed when specifying multi-stage and variable speed equipment. In the case of basic retrofits, a
quick assessment that estimates acceptable equipment sizing within the margins of what is available
from the manufacturer would be sufficient to avoid gross oversizing without placing undue burden on
the contractor or creating a false sense of precision by asking for detailed inputs that may not be
available to the technician. In the case of multi-stage and variable speed equipment, sizing strategies